Pollard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Opinion by

Judge TERRY.

In this automobile insurance coverage action, we consider whether an insurer had a duty to offer enhanced benefits coverage to its insured, and conclude that it did not. Although our analysis deals primarily with provisions of the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (No-Fault Act) that have since been repealed, we also consider other sources that might create such a duty.

Plaintiff, Larry Pollard, appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and the dismissal of his complaint. We affirm.

I

The…