Legal Opinion
People v. Mallory
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to suppress certain oral and written statements made to the police was properly denied. The statements made by defendant in the police vehicle resulted from a threshold police inquiry "designed to clarify the nature of the situation” rather than to obtain a confession (People v Huffman, 41 NY2d 29, 34). Thus, those statements were not the product of custodial interrogation to which Miranda warnings are applicable (see, People v Huffman, supra; People v Stackhouse, 160 AD2d 822, 823, lv denied 76 NY2d 865; People v Sims, 150 AD2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. PoblinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BrainardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. StackhouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. SimsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. HymesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- HYMES, ANACIN L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. HymesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015