Legal Opinion

Tonkin Distributing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 23, 1952No. C. D. 1491PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

These three protests were consolidated and tried at the port of San Francisco. The merchandise consists of what is described on the invoices as Pernod 40%, Pernod 40°, and Pernod Fils 40°. Entry 7001 covered by protest 980785-G also involves a commodity invoiced as “Amer Picon.” All of the merchandise, with the exception of that covered by entry 5794, protest 980785-G, was assessed at the rate of $5 per proof gallon under the provisions of paragraph 802 of the Tariff Act of 1930. As to said entry 5794, which the red-ink notations on-the face thereof show 2.73 per centum sugar…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Julius Wile Sons & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miles v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API