Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Howard Copper Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1925No. Civil No. 2280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

December 28, 1920, Nellie Murphy and J. S. Johnson, hereinafter called plaintiffs, filed suit in the superior court of Yavapai county to quiet title to the Copper Dyke mining claim. The property was located in the Black Canyon mining district, in Yavapai county, and the ground covered thereby was in conflict with the Copper Schist No. 2 mining claim, owned by the Howard Copper Company, a corporation, hereinafter called defendant. Defendant had, on June 10, 1920, filed application for patent on the Copper Schist No. 2, along with other claims. Notice of application was published in August and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Steel v. Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Quinby v. ConlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Lee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. MorrowArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Johnston v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API