Auditor General v. Pullman Palace Car Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Cooley, Ch. J:
The writ of error in this case must be dismissed. The proceedings had in the court below were on appeal from an assessment of taxes made by the auditor general. The appeal to that court was taken under act No. 57 of 1872 (S. L. Vol. I, p. 89), and the proceedings under that act were evidently not intended to be judicial in the proper sense of that term. The statute was evidently designed to make.the circuit court an appellate tax tribunal, and nothing more. Its conclusion would not be a judgment, but only an assessment.
There are difficulties in giving effect to such a statute,…
2Cited by11 opinions
- People ex rel. Ayres v. Board of State AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Mackin v. Taylor County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- State Tax-Law CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- United States Gypsum Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Indianapolis v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.