Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manning v. Walter S. Johnson Building Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2003Published

1Dissent

Pigott, Jr., P.J., and Lawton, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. We conclude that as a matter of law it cannot be said that the actions of Terry Manning (plaintiff) were the sole proximate cause of the accident and that it therefore is immaterial whether he walked or fell off the scaffolding for purposes of defendant’s liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). “Plaintiff’s alleged contributory negligence has no bearing on defendant [’s] liability under the statute” (Lang v Mancuso & Son, 298 AD2d 960, 961 [2002]; see Oaks v Pioneer Dev. Co., 294 AD2d 897 [2002]; Steves v Campus Indus., 288…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kazmierczak v. Town of ClarenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Lang v. Chas. Mancuso & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Oaks v. Pioneer Development Co. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Steves v. Campus IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API