Legal Opinion
Alscot Investing Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Rockville Centre
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1985PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs.
In anticipation of forthcoming amendments to chapter 104 of the Village Code, a local law governing display signs, respondents imposed a partial moratorium on the issuance of sign permits. Subsequently, petitioner applied for permission to construct a roof sign, the plans for which satisfied the requirements of chapter 104 as it then existed. Respondents having failed to act on the application for six weeks, petitioner commenced this article 78 proceeding seeking, among…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pokoik v. SilsdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Faymor Development Co. v. Board of Standards & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Temkin v. KaragheuzoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Alscot Investing Corp. v. Incorporated Village of Rockville CentreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by61 opinions
- Zagoreos v. ConklinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Asman v. AmbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Rocky Point Drive-In, L.P. v. Town of BrookhavenNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Scism v. FialaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Bibeau v. Village Clerk of Village of Tuxedo ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.