Legal Opinion

Niemeyer v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1976PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Justice.

The appellants, Niemeyer and Tolbert, were tried and convicted of rape and their sentences fixed at life imprisonment. The only serious question presented by their appeal concerns the admission of testimony elicited by the Commonwealth’s Attorney during his questioning of the prosecutrix, the arresting officer and the appellants, and comments made during his closing argument.

Niemeyer and Tolbert were among a group of men who participated in the gang-style rape of Karen Zerhusen, the prosecu-trix. At the time of the assault she and her fiancé were seated in a car parked in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Abernathy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  5. Cessna v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Murrell Toby Hockenbury, III v. Dewey Sowders, Superintendent, Kentucky State Penitentiary, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Smith v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Romans v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. McIntoshKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Moore v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1982

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API