Legal Opinion

Adonis Constantinovici v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General et al.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 13, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02405Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADONIS CONSTANTINOVICI, Case No.: 3:25-cv-02405-RBM-AHG 12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 v. DENYING IN PART PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES 14 PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO GENERAL et al., 15 JUSTICE ACT,

28 U.S.C. § 2412

Defendants. 16 [Doc. 17] 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Adonis Constantinovici’s (“Petitioner”) 20 Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act,

28 U.S.C. § 2412

21 (“Motion”). (Doc. 17.) Respondents filed a Response in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API