Legal Opinion
Eaton Mfg. Co. v. Sibley
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 6, 1945No. 3753PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LEDERLE, District Judge.
1. Plaintiff, Eaton Manufacturing Company, hereinafter referred to as Eaton, is an Ohio corporation. Defendants Eugene Sibley and Franklin D. Dougherty, trustee, are citizens of Michigan, and reside in this District. Defendant Sibley Rotary Pump Company is a Michigan corporation and has its principal place of business in this District. These three defendants will hereinafter be referred to as Sibley. Defendant Ford Motor Company, hereinafter referred to as Ford, is a Delaware corporation which transacts business in this District and the acts complained of took place in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Altvater v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- E. Edelmann & Co. v. Triple-A Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Booth v. Stutz Motor Car Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- M. O. S. Corp. v. John I. Haas, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1965