Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Estate of Watson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1984No. 83-248Published

1DissentBoslaugh, J.

The clear and unambiguous language of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2353(b)(3) (Reissue 1979) provides that where there has been a valid court proceeding concluded by an order purporting to terminate all marital property rights, a party governed by such an order cannot be deemed a “surviving spouse.” A reading of this plain language leads to the inescapable conclusion that where, as in the present case, a husband has been a party to such an order, he cannot receive another share of his wife’s estate as a “surviving spouse.” The eighth circuit reached this conclusion in applying § 30-2353 in Prudential…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County of Douglas v. Board of Regents of University of NebraskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'n v. SchnoorNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Norden Laboratories, Inc. v. County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Prudential Insurance Company of America, a Corporation v. Robert James Dulek and Betty Lou Dulek, Bonnie Lynn DulekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API