Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 2016No. 4D13-3689Published

1ConcurrenceGross, J.

I concur in the majority’s decision because current Florida law gives a sentencing judge unlimited discretion to sentence a defendant up to the maximum term set by the legislature for a particular crime. Also, the last time the Florida Supreme Court considered a cruel or unusual punishment challenge to a sentence, the court rejected it. See Hall v. State, 823 So.2d 757, 760-61 (Fla.2002) (finding that the Florida Criminal Punishment Code did not violate federal or state constitutional guarantees against cruel or unusual punishment). However, Hall was decided prior to Graham v. Florida, 560…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API