Lash v. City of Traverse City
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNeff, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right an order of the trial court granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition on the basis that defendant’s residency requirement for employment was consistent with statutory restrictions under MCL 15.602. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
i
This case presents two issues of statutory interpretation concerning MCL 15.602, which restricts governmental entities from imposing residency requirements as a condition of employment or promotion. We must first decide whether MCL 15.602 permits a private cause of action to enforce the act’s provisions and,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pompey v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Lamphere Schools v. Lamphere Federation of TeachersMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Nastal v. Henderson & Associates Investigations, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Burl Mcliechey v. Bristol West Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- McLiechey v. Bristol West InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.