Legal Opinion · Dissent

MC Holdings, L.L.C. Vs. Davis County Board of Review

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 3, 2013No. 11–1501Published

1DissentWaterman, Justice

(dissenting).'

I respectfully dissent. I believe the majority errs by second-guessing the decision of the Davis County Board of Review (Board) to deny the untimely property-assessment protest of a taxpayer who missed the statutory deadline to file a petition' stating a ground for relief. The Board correctly rejected MC Holdings’ request to cure its deficient filing, stating:

This correspondence is to notify you of Davis County Board of Review’s decision to not act upon your “Application For Reconsideration” due to untimely filing. To accept this application would result in inequity to other…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Esterdahl v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. Metropolitan Jacobson Development Venture v. Board of Review of Des MoinesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1991
  3. Austin Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Wade Farms, Inc. v. City of WeldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Purethane, Inc. v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API