Legal Opinion

Aguglia v. Hills Department Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting plaintiffs’ expert to render an opinion on the question of whether defendant’s security personnel had "reasonable cause” to detain plaintiff, Sandra Aguglia, for suspected shoplifting (see, Selkowitz v County of Nassau, 45 NY2d 97; Dier v City of New York, 79 AD2d 596).

We reject defendant’s contention that plaintiffs failed to establish, as a matter of law, a causal connection between the incident and the aggravation of Sandra Aguglia’s preexisting "dry eye” condition.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Selkowitz v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Dier v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Guzman v. Saks Fifth Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Hargraves v. Agway Petroleum Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. Conti v. MahoneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API