Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 25, 1970No. 8 Div. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Judge.

A jury found Troyt Taylor guilty of obtaining property by false pretense. His punishment was fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

At the conclusion of the State’s case, appellant moved to exclude the evidence, rested his case, and requested the general affirmative charge.

The alleged pretense is that appellant represented to an agent of the First National Bank of Russellville that he had forty-five Jersey heifers on which he could give a good and valid mortgage.

It is contended in brief that the State failed to prove the falsity of the pretense; hence, the trial court should have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GrimmettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Holloway v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Carlisle v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1969

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Latham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. SHOALS NAT. BANK OF FLORENCE v. Home Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1974
  3. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  4. Ex Parte DonleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Beaty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API