Legal Opinion
Eutimio Oregel, Jr., Javier Oregel, Mary Oregel v. Richard Hassna, Oakland Police Officer Terrence McCrea Oakland Police Officer City of Oakland
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 1995No. 93-16353Published
1Opinion of the Court
57 F.3d 1077
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Eutimio OREGEL, Jr., Javier Oregel, Mary Oregel, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Richard HASSNA, Oakland Police Officer; Terrence McCrea,
Oakland Police Officer; City of Oakland,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 93-16353.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 15, 1994.
Decided May 25, 1995.
Before: SKOPIL, NORRIS,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Adriana International Corp. v. ThoerenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.