Legal Opinion

Kuechler v. Volgmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1923PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The trial court sustained the demurrer on the ground that, the complaint having alleged that defendant treated the plaintiff according to the methods used by memr bers of defendant’s profession, namely by chiropractors,- it negatived negligence and lack of skill, since the rule is that a physician is required to exercise only'that degree of care, diligence, judgment, and skill which other physicians of good standing of the same school or system of practice usually exercise in the same or similar localities under like or similar circumstances, having due regard to the advanced state of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. HarringtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Commonwealth v. ZimmermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Wurdemann v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Jaeger v. StrattonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Marchand v. BellinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CorbinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Janssen v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Baker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964
  4. Kerkman v. HintzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Treptau v. Behrens Spa, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API