Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Larkins

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1033PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cercone, J.,

Appellant, who was tried in a non-jury trial and found guilty of criminal conspiracy, burglary, and theft by unlawful taking or disposition, now contends that there was not sufficient evidence to convict him on the above charges.

In reviewing this case the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Cimaszewski, 447 Pa. 141, 143 (1972); Commonwealth v. Miller, 445 Pa. 282 (1971). With this standard in mind the evidence against appellant can be stated as follows. At 7:30 p.m. on September 15, 1973 appellant was observed standing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CimaszewskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MadisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. TingleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. In the Interest of GonzalezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API