Legal Opinion

State v. Smithhisler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1920No. 22,465PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Harper district court; George L. Hay, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

This action was brought by the plaintiff under the intoxicating liquor law to enjoin the defendants from maintaining a nuisance. A temporary injunction was granted, and from the order granting that injunction the defendants appeal. Their contention is that the evidence showed that the place was closed at the time the action was commenced, and had been closed for some days prior thereto; and that therefore no injunction should have been granted. The evidence showed that the defendants had sold Jamaica ginger, Wine of Life, Beef, Wine and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curlee v. State ex rel. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. State ex rel. McGriff v. Lutsch, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1924
  3. State v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API