Legal Opinion

Gilman v. F. O. Bailey Carriage Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 30, 1928No. 5853; No. 5354PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

Two actions of assumpsit tried together in the court below and brought forward in a single record.

In No. 5353 the defendant is sued as maker of seven promissory notes, and as indorser of four customer’s notes so called, all of which the plaintiff holds as indorsee. In No. 5354 the plaintiff seeks to recover upon seven checks drawn by the defendant and transferred to the plaintiff by the payee.

Verdict was for the plaintiff in both suits, and the cases come before this Court on general motions and exceptions to denial of motion for directed verdicts, rulings upon evidence during the trial, and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  3. Culver v. MarksIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Murray v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Usher v. A. S. Tucker Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  2. Gregory v. JamesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  3. John Paulding Meade Co. v. StrongMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API