People v. Miller
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
The issue, apparently one of first impression, is whether the loss of a "rape kit,” either by a hospital or by the police, requires the imposition of a sanction. Under the circumstances of this case, the court finds that imposition of an appropriate sanction is required here.
Defendant stands indicted, inter alia, for rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree. It is alleged that, *825on October 18, 1991, defendant, who was known to the complaining witness, forced her into his bedroom where, at gunpoint, he raped and assaulted her. He was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. HauptNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. TissoisNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. ReedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. AllgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993