Legal Opinion

Woonsocket Rubber Co. v. Rubber Clothing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for allowance.

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

— This is a motion for an extra allowance upon a recovery upon the claim set out in the complaint, and also upon a counter-claim set forth in the defendant’s answer arising out of an alleged breach of warranty in regard to a certain portion of the goods sold by plaintiff to defendant, and which were sent to and received by the defendants at San Francisco, amounting to some $6,000.

The trial involved the labor of proving the sale and delivery of goods amounting to between $600,000 and $700,000, and extending through several years and embracing a great number of transactions.

The defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Foot v. Ætna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lissberger v. Schoenberg Metal Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API