Legal Opinion

Nute v. York

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Wrtt ok Entry, for land in Alton of which Eben Hayes died seized. The plaintiffs are the heirs at law of Eben, and the defendants are the heirs of his deceased widow. Eben died intestate January 10, 1890, leaving no child or the issue of any child surviving him. His widow died ten days later. She did not file a release of her right of dower and homestead in the probate office or registry of deeds.

Read the full summary

Wrtt ok Entry, for land in Alton of which Eben Hayes died seized. The plaintiffs are the heirs at law of Eben, and the defendants are the heirs of his deceased widow. Eben died intestate January 10, 1890, leaving no child or the issue of any child surviving him. His widow died ten days later. She did not file a release of her right of dower and homestead in the probate office or registry of deeds. After her death the plaintiffs and defendants, without legal advice, and supposing the widow, and under her the defendants as her heirs at law, were entitled to one half the land, made by parol an…

1Opinion of the Court

Carpenter J.

The widow took her dower and homestead right. G. L., c. 202, s. 10 ; Laws 1883, c. 34. The defendants have no title. The rights of the parties are not affected by the parol division.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

Clark, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horner v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API