Legal Opinion

Schlosser v. Goldberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 14, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Chief Justice.

A jury having returned a finding of no cause of action, judgment for the defendant was entered in the Court of Common Pleas in Passaic county and the plaintiff appeals. The basis of the suit was the personal illness which the plaintiff Kate Schlosser says she suffered by drinking carbonated water purchased by her from the defendant, for which she demands damages. The husband joins the plaintiff wife seeking damages for loss of his wife’s services and his expenses incurred through her illness.

Of the eight grounds of appeal listed as error four are argued. The remainder we…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. JumanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Simon v. Graham BakeryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API