Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 16, 2002No. 00-795Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Justice O’Connor, with whom The Chief Justice and Justice Scalia join as to Part II,

concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part.

The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA), 18 Ú. S. C. §2251 et seq., proscribes the “knowin[g]” reproduction, distribution, sale, reception, or possession of images that fall under the statute’s definition of child pornography, §2252A(a). Possession is punishable by up to 5 years in prison for a first offense, § 2252A(b), and all other transgressions are punishable by up to 15 years in prison for a first offense, § 2252A(a). The CPPA defines…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API