Legal Opinion

C. Graham & Sons Co. v. Van Horn

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action by G. Graham & Sons Company against Alfred Van Horn and others. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtSpring, J.

This action was brought to recover on three promissory notes, aggregating $2,300. The notes were three of a series, all given for work done and materials furnished in fitting up a drug store for the defendants. An action was commenced on the first of the series of notes in the city court of New York, and an answer was interposed, among other things,- setting up a counterclaim that the defendants had sustained damages by reason of the negligent and improper performance of the work by the plaintiff. Judgment was obtained against defendants in that action by default. The same plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Embury v. . ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  3. Reich v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Carleton v. . Lombard, Ayres Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Gates v. . PrestonNew York Court of Appeals · 1869

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heine v. Albin Gustafson Co.New York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Crompton & Knowles Loom Works v. BrownAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
  3. Crompton & Knowles Loom Works v. BrownCity of New York Municipal Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API