Legal Opinion

In re Jewish Child Care Association

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 12, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order sustaining a writ of habeas corpus and directing appellants to return an infant

*699to the custody of respondent. Order affirmed, without costs. Respondent as an authorized agency, in conjunction with the Commissioner of Welfare of the City of New York, is vested by legislative enactment with the right to the custody of the infant (Social Welfare Law, § 383, subd. 2; Administrative Code of City of New York, §§ 603-1.0, 603-2.0). These statutes constitute a valid exercise of the Legislature’s reserved power over infants, responsibility for whose custody devolves upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Finlay v. FinlayNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . NicholsNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. People Ex Rel. Riesner v. New York Nursery & Child's HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. In re StarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. People ex rel. Our Lady of Victory Infant Home v. VenniroNew York Supreme Court · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API