Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Macklin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Saliue county. The facts appear in the opinion. cited Frink v. Flanagan, 1 Gilm., 35. Cutler v. Rathbone, 1 Hill, 204. Adams v. Hubbard, 30 Mich., 104. WilUams v. West, 2 Ohio State, 82. Grace v Mitchell, 31 Wis., 533. Wise v. Withers, 3 Oranch, 331. FlUott v. Piersol, 1 Pet., 340. Grumond v. Raymond, 1 Conn., 46. Gould v. Scannell, 13 Cal., 430. Wa/rner v. Hunt, 30 Wis., 200. Black v. Winterstein, 6 Neb., 224. cited Gen. Stat., 552. Bilbo v.…

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Saliue county. The facts appear in the opinion. cited Frink v. Flanagan, 1 Gilm., 35. Cutler v. Rathbone, 1 Hill, 204. Adams v. Hubbard, 30 Mich., 104. WilUams v. West, 2 Ohio State, 82. Grace v Mitchell, 31 Wis., 533. Wise v. Withers, 3 Oranch, 331. FlUott v. Piersol, 1 Pet., 340. Grumond v. Raymond, 1 Conn., 46. Gould v. Scannell, 13 Cal., 430. Wa/rner v. Hunt, 30 Wis., 200. Black v. Winterstein, 6 Neb., 224. cited Gen. Stat., 552. Bilbo v. Henderson, 21 Iowa, 56. Booth v. Ableman, 16 Wis., 460. Macklot v. City of Davenport, 17 Iowa, 379. Carney v. Doyle, 14…

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

This an action of replevin. The plaintiff filed an affidavit in the court below describing certain personal property, and alleging “ that the said plaintiff is the owner of the said goods and chattels, and entitled to the immediate possession of the same; and that said goods and chattels are wrongfully detained from him by defendant, and that the said goods and chattels were not taken in execution on any order or judgment against *52said plaintiff, but were taken by execution issued against plad/ntiff on void judgment, or for the payment of any tax, fine, or amercement assessed against him, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Mills v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  3. O'dea v. Washington CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Wimberly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API