State v. Martin
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
¶1 Under ER 702, opinion testimony by an expert witness must be based on a theory generally accepted in the scientific community. Here, the trial court conducted a Frye1 hearing and determined that the betrayal trauma theory espoused by the defendant’s expert was not generally accepted in the scientific community and, *623further, that even if the theory met the Frye standard for delayed reporting of childhood sexual abuse, it was not established as a theory relevant to adult domestic violence and thus not particularly helpful to the issue of intent in a domestic violence case. The trial court is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Sheryl Jean MartinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Shane Ryan ChamberlainCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018