Scott v. Ross
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
It is argued by counsel for appellants, and it seems to be conceded by counsel for respondent, that the judgment of the county court rendered February 14, 1899, was erroneous.
The judgment assigned the remainder as being vested in the children then living instead of being contingent during the life of the surviving widow, liable to be defeated by death prior to her death. In this respect the case is ruled by Cashman v. Ross, 155 Wis. 558, 145 N. W. 199, where it was said (p. 560):
“The devise in the instant case meets the conditions of this language. .It is not a present devise to the children.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kiernan v. Dutchess County Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Brook v. ChappellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
- Washburn v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Fraser v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brunton v. NUVELL CREDIT CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Estate of HatzlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Estate of GarbadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Brunton v. NUVELL CREDIT CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Brunton v. NUVELL CREDIT CORP.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.