Legal Opinion

Matter of Trilling and Montague

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 1956No. 24194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

In view of the thoroughly considered review of authorities contained in the opinion of the learned Referee, a detailed discussion of them here would be superfluous. I fully agree that the weight of authority decidedly supports the Referee’s conclusion that the trustee in bankruptcy is hot bound by the restrictive stock agreement and that he had the right and obligation to sell the stock for the best price obtainable.

Whatever the implications of the decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Garrett v. Philadelphia Lawn Mower Co., 39 Pa.Super. 78, may be, all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Philadelphia Lawn Mower Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Barrows v. National Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1878

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Seven Springs Farm, Inc. v. CrokerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In Re BaquetUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1986
  3. Mathews v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
  4. Witte v. Beverly Lakes Investment Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Avoyelles Trust & Sav. Bank v. LILIEDAHL'S ESTATELouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API