Legal Opinion

State v. Yarbrough

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 2013No. A12-1872PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

In this pretrial appeal, the state argues that the district court erred by finding a lack of nexus between the alleged criminal activity and respondent’s residence, where the signed search warrant included evidence of drug dealing and evidence that respondent possessed and used a gun in committing a crime a few days before the search was executed. Because it was common sense and reasonable to infer that respondent would keep the gun at his residence, we reverse and remand.

FACTS

On May 10, 2012, law enforcement requested a search warrant to search a residential address in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. Henry Albert SteevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API