Legal Opinion

Kimble v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1975No. 2287PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a conviction for armed robbery. Kimble contends that the indictment by which he was charged should have been dismissed as duplicitous; that the victim’s identification of him should have been suppressed as the product of tainted pretrial contacts; that an identification of his photograph should have been suppressed because counsel was not present at the photo display; that it was error for the trial judge to refuse to call additional veniremen when none of the venire was of the same race as Kimble; and that it was a denial of due process…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. Joseph T. BouthotCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  3. Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  5. Hampton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API