Kimble v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for armed robbery. Kimble contends that the indictment by which he was charged should have been dismissed as duplicitous; that the victim’s identification of him should have been suppressed as the product of tainted pretrial contacts; that an identification of his photograph should have been suppressed because counsel was not present at the photo display; that it was error for the trial judge to refuse to call additional veniremen when none of the venire was of the same race as Kimble; and that it was a denial of due process…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- United States v. Joseph T. BouthotCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Hampton v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.