Smoley v. Smoley
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
A significant issue at this dissolution trial was the amount of the self-employed husband’s actual income. See Ugarte v. Ugarte, 608 So.2d 838, 840 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Seitz v. Seitz, 471 So.2d 612, 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Although there was some support in the record for the judge’s finding that the husband had $173,000 in annual income, we remand for the trial court to make specific factual findings as to the sources of the income and any adjustments to it that are germane to his ability to pay support. Bimonte v. Martin-Bimonte, 679 So.2d 18 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); § 61.08(2)(g), Fla. Stat.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Seitz v. SeitzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Ugarte v. UgarteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Keaton v. KeatonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Bimonte v. Martin-BimonteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Monas v. MonasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995