Legal Opinion

Smith v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided January 8, 1988No. 86-3304PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLS, District Judge:

Statute of limitations.

Applied retroactively?

No.

This action, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant argues that Plaintiff failed to file his action within the appropriate statute of limitations.

This ground for summary judgment presents an issue of first impression in this circuit.

The short answer: Motion denied.

I. FACTS

Plaintiff, a black male, secured a position with the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company in April of 1981. Plaintiff had previously worked for Firestone in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. 49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1730, 50 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,087 Leroy Smith, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Lewis v. RusseDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  3. Malhotra v. Cotter & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  4. Rick Nolan's Auto Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. Riemensnyder v. BarrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API