Legal Opinion
Chase v. Clinton County
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1928No. Docket No. 69PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages alleged to have been suffered through negligence of the board,' of county road commissioners of Clinton county causing costly delay in the execution by him of a contract for construction of a State reward road in that county. His declaration is based on tort, in a plea of trespass on the case, alleging actionable negligence on the part of the board of county road commissioners in not sooner taking proper steps to relieve the contract from an injunction against it issued by the circuit court of Clinton county, in chancery, restraining the board…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Tuttle v. George H. Gilbert Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- McCarthy v. Second Parish of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hart v. LudwigMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Loweke v. Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Fultz v. Union-Commerce AssociatesMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- American and Foreign Insurance Company v. BoltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Bourgonje v. MacHevAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.