Legal Opinion

State v. Shirley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 30, 2011No. A11A0500PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mikell, Judge.

Finding a violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial, the trial court granted Ramone Shirley’s motion to dismiss indictment. The state argues on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion in applying the balancing test formulated by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo. For the reasons set forth below, we disagree and affirm.

Shirley was arrested on September 20, 2006, and was subsequently indicted for trafficking in cocaine. He filed his motion to dismiss indictment for delay in prosecution on February 17, 2010. The motion came before the trial…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  4. Ruffin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  5. State v. PorterSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Carder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API