Legal Opinion · Dissent
General Electric Company v. Masters Mail Order Company of Washington, D.C., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 15, 1957No. 198, Docket 24370Published
1DissentLumbard, Circuit Judge
I dissent for the reasons so well stated by Judge Bicks below, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1956, 145 F.Supp. 57. The sales complained of took place in New York and New York may prohibit them. Accordingly the district court had the power and the duty to enjoin these New York sales, offers to sell and advertising.
Masters, Inc. of New York has frequently been before the New York courts for violation of the Feld-Crawford Act. In 1952, Masters, Inc. was enjoined from selling General Electric appliances below fair-traded prices, Sup., 122 N.Y.S.2d 14, and in 1953 was fined twice for violating the injunction. Not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Electric Co. v. Masters, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Bissell Carpet Sweeper Co. v. Masters Mail Order Co. of Washington, D. C., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Samuel Adler, Inc. & Local 584Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Bissell Carpet Sweeper Company v. Masters Mail Order Company of Washington, D. C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Masters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.