Legal Opinion

United States v. CAP Quality Care, Inc.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 2, 2007No. Civil 05-163-P-HPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AFFIRMING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART THE RECOMMENDED DECISION ON MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

HORNBY, District Judge.

Can the government recover Title 21 civil penalties from a methadone maintenance clinic that dispenses methadone in split doses (half the dose under supervision at the clinic; the other half unsupervised at home) when the clinic has not followed the “time-in-treatment” regulations that the Secretary of Health and Human Services has adopted under Title 42 for take-home methadone treatment?

Following oral argument on March 15, 2007,1 conclude that Title 21 civil…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Gonzales v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Advance Pharmaceutical, Inc., Tasrin Hossain, and Liaquat Hossain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Louis J. Badia, M.D.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API