Legal Opinion

Browne v. County of Dutchess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review so much of a determination of the respondent Adrian H. Anderson, as Sheriff of the County of Dutchess, dated February 19, 2003, as found the petitioner guilty of misconduct under Charge I, specifications 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, and terminated the petitioner’s employment.

Adjudged that the branch of the petition which is, in effect, to vacate so much of the determination as found the petitioner guilty of misconduct under Charge I, specifications 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, and terminated the petitioner’s employment, is granted, on the law, without…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curry v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Ferguson v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Russo v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Boone v. RistichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alarcon v. Board of Education of South Orangetown Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Mateo v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Mateo v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API