Legal Opinion
Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 17, 1966No. 14673Published
1Opinion
On Motions for Rehearing
On this motion for rehearing we have-been favored with a brief by Amicus Curiae raising a question which has given us serious concern. The Amicus Curiae states this proposition:
“A casualty insurance company is required under the laws of this State to establish a reserve for a potential loss even though liability for it may be denied and since premium rates are fixed by the State the charging and accepting of a premium payment cannot be grounds to avoid the terms of an executed non-waiver agreement so as to hold the insurance company estopped to deny coverage under the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- United Service Automobile Ass'n v. MilesTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. StubbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Cormier v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Michel v. American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.