Oades v. Oades
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Weaver, J. The opinion states the case. cited 8 Cowen, 600. 6 Bo'sw., 668. 6 Johns., 502. 19 La. Ann., 180. 22 Texas, 650. 10 Minn., 216. cited Van Vleet v. OUn, 4 Nevada, 98. James v. Brooks, 6 Heisk.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Weaver, J. The opinion states the case. cited 8 Cowen, 600. 6 Bo'sw., 668. 6 Johns., 502. 19 La. Ann., 180. 22 Texas, 650. 10 Minn., 216. cited Van Vleet v. OUn, 4 Nevada, 98. James v. Brooks, 6 Heisk. (Tenn.), 150. Austin v. Bainter, 50 111., 308. Lowe v. Traynor, 6 Coldw., 633. Field v. Holland, 6 Cranch, 8. Orgañn v. Ramsey, 3 Humph., 580. Blair AJ?mr. v. Dockery, 24 Wis., 502. Gray v. Eaton, 5 Cal., 448.
1Opinion of the Court
Gantt, . J.
The defendant in error brought action in the district court for divorce, upon the alleged ground of adultery *305committed by plaintiff in error with one James Pollard. The plaintiff in error admitted the marriage of the parties and that they cohabited together, and had no children, but she “denies each and every other allegation set forth in the petition.” This is a general denial of the allegation of adultery, which is the only issuable fact raised by the pleadings. This issue was submitted to the consideration of a jury, who by their verdict find that the plaintiff is not guilty of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lewis v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by2 opinions
- Manning v. City of OrleansNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Brotherton v. BrothertonNebraska Supreme Court · 1881