State v. Archuleta
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINZNER, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction for possession of marijuana. The first and second calendar notices proposed summary affirmance. Defendant has timely filed two memoranda in opposition to proposed summary affirmance in response to the calendar notices. Having reviewed defendant’s memoranda, and not being persuaded by them, we affirm.
Defendant was stopped by a police officer for running a red light while driving his motorcycle. When defendant got off the motorcycle, the officer noticed a bulge, so he asked defendant to raise his shirt and saw what looked like…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HowellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Smith v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Glymph v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. SarellanoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. Sergio VNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010