Legal Opinion

Brehaut v. Laveck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants submitted evidence in admissible form establishing as a matter of law that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957; Muratore v Tierney, 229 AD2d 1018). “The burden then shifted to plaintiff to come forward with sufficient evidence to overcome defendant [s’] motion by demonstrating that she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gaddy v. EylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Uhl v. SofiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Dubois v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API