Legal Opinion

People v. Sennett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to move to withdraw the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Engert, 263 AD2d 959, lv denied 93 NY2d 1017). The plea allocution did not engender significant doubt regarding the voluntariness of the plea to bring this case within the narrow exception to the preservation doctrine (see, People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 NY2d 839; People v Lopez, supra, at 666).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People v. ToxeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. EngertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. BilinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. People v. JandreauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API