Legal Opinion

Morciglio v. South Porto Rico Sugar Co.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided August 22, 1919No. 1318Published

1Opinion of the Court

HamiltoN, Judge,

delivered the following opinion:

This suit was brought by plaintiff, an American citizen, ■against defendant in the local courts, and upon application of ■defendant was removed to the United States district court. The motion is now made to remand the case on the ground that the defendant, while admittedly incorporated in’ New Jersey, is domiciled in Porto Rico, and hence under § 41 of the Jones Act of March 12, 1917, without the jurisdiction of the Federal court. The proof submitted seems to show that the defendant was incorporated in New Jersey, that it does a very large…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Martinsburg & Potomac Railroad v. MarchSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Barron v. BurnsideSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API