Legal Opinion
United States v. Edgar Maldonado
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1995No. 94-50160Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
47 F.3d 1177
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Edgar MALDONADO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50160.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 15, 1995.*
Decided Feb. 24, 1995.
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Edgar Maldonado appeals the sentence of 135 months imposed following his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Taofig Olabiyi BlaizeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Kyung Hwan MunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991