Coombs v. Commissioner
United States Board of Tax Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*1322OPINION.
Matthews :
In the earlier proceeding brought by one of the petitioners here upon the same issue as to the years 1922, 1923 and 1924, we held that a partnership did not exist between this husband and wife for those years, saying:
The evidence here fails to establish any agreement to share the losses of the business; or that a relation of mutual agency existed between the parties; or that the petitioner’s wife had any authority to act, or did act, in the name of the partnership. The written agreement came too late to affect the years before us. In any event, it contains at the most a…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Champlin v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Riley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
- Shapiro v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934
- Coombs v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932