Legal Opinion

Hasterlik v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 20, 1923No. Gen. No. 27,748PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff brought suit against defendant on a policy of burglary insurance to recover the value of a stock of liquors stolen from the plaintiff’s place of business. There was a verdict and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $4,903.20, to reverse which the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The record discloses that plaintiff was engaged in the liquor business in Chicago and on November 27, 1918, the defendant issued to plaintiff its burglary insurance policy for $5,000. The policy was for a period of one year. On the 10th and 14th of August, 1919, plaintiff’s premises were burglarized and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Ins. Co of Hartford, Conn. v. GullettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. Burrell Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Harman v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  4. Ohio Farmers' Ins. v. YoasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  5. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. Burrell Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API